Those familiar with Quantum Mechanics, Modern Physics, and General Relativity should be interested to know that many things that are deemed as "Impossible" by the regular scientific community are now no longer merely the heresay of the heretics of experiential exposure. 

Mathematicians, physicists and the like have came upon simple mathematic proofs that prove Faster than light travel to no longer be a thing easily dismissed as improbable. 

LIke most people who are familiar with similar defamations, these people can't find root without ridicule in scientific or philosophical journals, but their math is there.  http://www.glafreniere.com/sa_relativity.htm  (here's the homepage too)  http://www.glafreniere.com/matter.htm .

This is one of those numerous things everyone seems to find that could change the world if only the avenues to its annoucement or fair exposure were made clear of the gnarling wreckage of indolent skeptics and naysayers. 

Although, contrary to the many world-changing things I've come across, such as Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (i.e. cold fusion and alchemy although duplication becomes the quandry for skepticism), Orgone, Joseph Newman's supposed free energy machine, and all along down the line; this one has roots and life in the very language that the skeptics speak and trust in as the language of God; math.  The math is there, it's just a matter of applying it.

Take a look here as well at an emerging site that tells it all.  http://www.spaceandmotion.com/

As Jung pointed out, in the "Undiscovered Self", through the explanation of theory and individual facts; on a gradable scale in which information is being acquired or extrapolated from "random pattern" or brought into focus or pulled out of its energetic space, there are areas or aspects similar to the "theory" that is being extrapolated from congealed individual facts that are marked sometimes (when recognized) are considered (as Jung noted) "extremes". 
 Looking at it from a 2 dimensional perspective (superimposing a 3rd and 4th dimension around the 2nd perspective: like a rectangular plane, a board of wood, a board of wood in a specific space time with particular energetic influences surrounding that section of space/time and the boards interrelationship (energetically) throughout the whole course of 4th dimensional space/time) after mild digresion, from this perspective, in the center of the board or plane is a specific energy pattern that has emerged more unfolded (In Bohm's quantum mechanics) or more obviously to human perception, and is surrounded by varying expressions of this identified energy pattern which look, depending on dimensional observation, as random from 2nd dimensional reasoning looking at its 4th dimensional
counterpart or "extremes" along 2nd dimensional perception (movement of molecules: fast, hot;slow, cold or slower frozen [yet the 2 dimensional thinking runs up against a brickwall when it encounters the abosolute extremes of its perception, with 0 kelvin representing
a kind of multidimensionally powerful expression, yet it is only the perception that can't look beyond the all encompassing power of its expression.  The expression, when taken in a different light or dimensional perspective, its influence appears starkly in comparison
to the forces in the new dimension it has becomed enveloped in due to its "explosion" into this new dimension from its previous dimension, requiring such great force as to warrant "leaping" or "exploding" out of "existence" into a new "reality", dimension])

 Thesis:  Extremes are only extreme relative to the baseline which declares the "ideal" or "optimal" level.  An extreme only looks extreme when associated in regards to "normalcy" or stasis, and yet the baseline is just as relative as the extremes.  The extremes, if analyzed in their own right and with proper perceptive capabilities of acquiesing any information (i.e. neandertal man understanding the concept of space/time, quantum mechanics, or chemistry in the "representative" or "objectified" sense of modern man [because a neandertal could no doubt understand certain things we don't understand intrinsicly better like wholeness or action/reaction, yet if the neandertal attempted to understand the knowledge the way modern man acquired it, through advanced symbol/problm solving
capabilities, it would be nearly impossible since the neandertal doesn't have the same capabilities as man or the experiental consciousness of understanding it, or maybe he does]) the extreme would be able to be understood as its own "baseline" or level of
normalcy relative to the new perspective. and yet, normalizing the perception of the extreme might also yield a new "dimensional" way of understanding patterns and relationships. 
 Such as the extreme example of a black hole, making the Event Horizon the level of normalcy between the Known Universe and The Other End of A Black Hole.  Once the other end of the extreme is understood, it might lead to higher yields or better understandings
of our already "Known Universe".  It might also create another Superimposition to be placed atop our "measuring stick" in a specific space/time. 
 I see a board (as a measuring stick) with its center in our "reality" with one end coming into our "reality" of space/time, matter and energy from a previous reality, and the other end of the board in space/time reaching the apex of our "reality" and turning the corner into another reality. and yet when the second far end explodes or turns the corner into another reality, this other reality isn't a seperate reality in the sense of our ability to understand present reality, it turns the corner into another reality which enfolds this "reality" within it as well as a brand new variety of multidimensional expression and expansion. (think of a mind which lives in each dimensional reality being able to comprehend the reality which lies beyond it, i.e. a person living in 2nd dimensional world envisioning a 3rd dimensional world)

Along the line of Relativistic, existential, or Ames psychology thinking:  The brain and body's reaction to chemicals is just that; a REACTION to chemicals.  The chemicals do not necessarily have an inherent characteristic that manifests itself in the body and brain
as the reaction that the body and brain have to it, it (chemical) merely initiates the body and brain's reaction to the chemical.

Chemicals don't cause the reaction, the body and brain cause the reaction to the chemicals. i.e.example:  Caffeine produces an alert exicted state in most humans, yet it is only the prescence of the caffeine that illicts this response to it.  The caffeine isn't acting
on the body, it is not "stimulating" as which is commonly thought, but is merely present and it is THE BODY AND BRAIN which REACT to the chemical/caffeine.
The "stimulation" idea would conclude that chemicals have an inherent quality that is released from them into the Body and Brain and thus illict the response or reaction.  Yet, it would seem that the chemicals' prescence in certain areas of the body and the Body and
Brain's predisposition to react to them (i.e. cannaboid and opiod receptors) is the major causal factor in Response.  When the chemical is leaving the body it might create a reaction on the sensory aspect of the organs it passes through, yet not always.  It is the
Body and Brain's ability to react chemicals that causes the response.  (think of the theory applied in Chemistry and in inorganic materials and their ability to "react" to stimulus or certain chemicals, molecules, elements).

17+23=40     4 and 0(meaning nothing or standing for the void inherent) and the two together: 40, implying a sythesis of the two: 4-the four seperate entities or numbers systhesized to be the number 4 and the fourth place in a foundation system (i.e. 1, then 2
which can't be 2 without the preceding 1 being apart of it and so on) and 0 which stress the void or nothingness, infinite creative potential inherent in this system. therefore= 40 becomes an entirely new expression of both aspects of 4 and 0, and becomes:

   -4th chakra Heart which supports the Soul Star/8th Chakra

           Similarly, the Heart Chakra's physical expression, the cardiac plexus or bronchial plexus or "The nerves that serve the chest, are the only ones that do not originate from a nerve plexus, Nerve Plexus-a network of intersecting nerves that combine sets of spinal nerves that serve the same area of the body into one large grouped nerve." i.e. the Heart Chakra's physical expression is free of spinal nerves to dictate directly its actions, hence the reported ease of Kundalini raising from the Heart Chakra, or the peace and "unconscious" or Akashic or Divine knowledge and Divine bonding proponed by Sufis about the Heart chakra-
        -(Sufis saying that the position of the Heart Chakra varies between the middle of the brain and the center of the chest can lead one to believe that the Soul Star's physical location could be the hypothalamus or any of the interior,centralized glands because of the
foundational relationship between the Heart chakra and the Soul Star as expressed here)-. 
 -However, in terms of Sufist belief in the infinite nature of the Heart, this could stem from a "crossover" or IChing extreme type in which, through such deep meditation on the Heart, which is a kind of "emanation" or at least foundational related to the Soul Star in respects to this hypothesis, one can emerge/expand into the Soul Star chakra through the Heart or at least into Soul Star consciousness as far as it can translate into the Heart and Love (I say this because Lilly notes that there are levels of consciousness above Love, which doesn't
necessarily deny its importance, but could rather suppose our limit to interpret such higher levels on an "emotional" or our current Heart Chakra level, hence this could only be an evolutionary hurdle and not an epitaph on Love; in fact, in light of this relationship with the
Heart chakra and Love and the Soul Star, Love is better validated as the best means to higher levels of understanding, consciousness, and evolution in general since the Heart Chakra and Love synthesizes knowledge from mere conception or abstraction, to experiential conception or experiential knowledge that can be understood, fully, and communicated)
 
 Also, as this hypothesis of relationship tries to show, the Soul Star is "above" or "outside" of the body and unattached to the rest of the chakra system directly, hence the "Guardian Angel" consciousness aspect of the Soul Star and its "foreign" or "another being" quality to it.

To look into this further:  examine the relational, dimensional hiearchy involved here: 

Heart Chakra   -   Nerve Plexi of the chest = limited attachment to the body via spinal nerves
Soul Star (including unknown aspects)  -   Soul Star chakra = limited energetic attachment to chakra system and further removed from the body (above head)
Sketch this out.  Words lack dimensional depth.

 
    -4th Social-Sexual Circuit which supports the 8th nonlocal quantum circuit

from http://teri.zaadz.com/blog

Here are the rules:

1.  Link to the person's blog who tagged you.

2.  Post these rules on your blog.

3.  List 7 random/weird facts about yourself.

4.  Tag 7 random people at the end of your post and include links to their blogs.

5.  Let each person know that they have been tagged by commenting on their blog.

spaghetti:

1.  ever since I was a kid my feet and hands itch intensly from time to time, on specific places; doctors have no idea what causes this.  In esoteric knowledge, however, these are energy exchange points.  Go figure.

2.  I dream of places I'm going to be at, before I'm there (sometimes many years before).

3.  Sometimes my dreams are "memories" of a moment I'm going to have in the future.  When they overlap (i.e. the moment happens) it is an ecstatic experience.

4.  Sometimes my dreams have brief moments where I am "awake" in my dreams (not lucid dreaming, since I'm always partially aware I'm dreaming).  It's as if my consciousness becomes as fully invested in my "dreambody" as it does when I'm awake;  The place I'm in and who I am are all as real, in experience, as when I'm awake.

5.  I treat my dream environment as a world we all inhabit (not just projections of friends or people, but actually them) and spend alot of time talking with my friends, meeting new people and sharing my love and friendliness with them, unabridged by waking misunderstanding (dreams are direct contact), and talking nonchanlantly about how we're dreaming, how I'm really feeling in my life, how I really care and love them.  I also spend time telling so many women friends how much I love them (feeling like I can't really express it in waking life like I can in the connectedness of the dreamtime).  I take full advantage of all of the positive aspects of dreams.

6.  I'm very easily overwhelmed to cry from happiness, and sadness that heals when I allow it to overwhelm me.  (I don't shunt this unnaturally, but can control this by simultaneous positive realizations; too many too often forces the body to react with hopeless sadness as an attempt to maintain emotional homeostasis. i.e. mind/body interface)

7.  I wish I could give love and be loved by the world at once.


I'll do part deux in a minute

I don't have anything up right now with music, cause I'm still enmeshed in the creative process. I'm basically trying to find my expressive voice.  I got to the point where I could play anything I wanted and realized "Ok,  what do I want to play?"  So I've been meditating and contemplating, and purveying and distilling myself.  I also realized that if I wanted my music to truly represent me, honestly, I had to be honest with myself.  So I started working on psychological, spiritual, moral/ethical issues and started distilling myself more and more.  I'm just about done and ready to start doing, but it is fascinating cause, from personal observation, issues of this or that weight can put you into a "space" (or have you in a space) that reflects and expresses your own shortcomings/struggles in that space, but after you clear away the crap that hinders your vision to see the size of the space you actually encompass (and beyond), it's like breathing out and in; it just happens so effortlessly but it is so deep and personally all-encompassing (and beyond).  
I love all kinds of music that stir you deep and make you move.  I picked up music because of the Dave Matthews Band.  Then I went through the gamut of classic rock and, eventually, jam bands, jazz.  When I found Peter Green, I realized that music can be more than just an imitation of what came before and that you can actually say something.  Peter Gabriel, my first musical love before I knew what music was, reignited me to find me.   David Gilmour has a quote when he's asked about who his influences were and I resonate with it and essentially learned from it; it's something like "My influences are so many and so different, but my real playing began when I became interested in me and what I sounded like".

Frustration - any emotion such as:  anger, sadness, disappointment, resentment, hate; substitute the feeling with one of frustration to better define the actuality of the feeling.  I'm angry because everybody is stupid/I'm frustrated because everybody is stupid I'm pissed off because my classes and professors and educational institutions miss the point/I'm frustrated.
 Anger, sadness, disappointment, hate, don't help the situation, they are emotional states which don't aid in resolving a problem but only show that a problem is apparent.  Such feelings like "this is hard" which can pertain to any problem: emotional, physical, social; in actuality is "frustrating" because all of these emotions center around an expected outcome or determined outcome, and when then opposite is shown, the body registers an emotion of disgust:  IT IS UP TO YOU TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM OR DEAL WITH IT EFFECTIVELY!!
I'm not angry, I'm frustrated
I'm not sad, I'm frustrated
I'm not pissed off, I'm frustrated
This isn't hard, its frustrating
This isn't difficult, its frustrating
 All these emotions give you a signal that something in your Belief System needs adjustment; otherwise these emotions will persist with the proper stimuli (i.e. your gonna keep getting pissed off and angry everytime you walk into class and they talk about something that you don't believe in or don't think is true.  you're actually experiencing frustration that things aren't happening differently to alleviate your emotional reaction of anger and pissed off ITS UP TO ME TO CHANGE FRUSTRATION!!)

All emotions like anger, sadness, pissed off are merely vague signals, they don't symbolize a state of being that will effectively change the situation; the emotions only make the situation aware to YOU; ONLY YOU.  The key is to realize this and deal with it by labeling it
something more managable.  If something makes you angry, you're only going to keep getting angry or you're going to try to do something that makes you not angry THIS IS AVOIDANCE.  Instead realize that this emotion is conveying conflict that needs to be resolved or at least put into perspective so that it doesn't become a vacuum (all emotions like anger and saddness are bottomless and insatiable; the only proper response to these emotions is to redefine them is what they actually are:  frustration-conflicting Belief Systems that lead to a destructive vague and insatiable force)

MAKE A CONSCIOUS EFFORT TO CHANGE THE CATALOGING OF THESE "NEGATIVE" EMOTIONS TO FRUSTRATION!!

Imagine:  In K-space and what is actually at the inside of planets and stars are the quantum dispersions or regurgitations of black holes.  All matter and light, gravity and energy that a black hole gathers, is compounded out of "existence" or to such a point that it doesn't exist in a rational sense in our dimensional way of perceiving, and becomes the magical manifesting energies of atoms, and planetary/stellar life. Atoms give birth to perpetually larger and larger forms of matter, energy and then combine together in a variety of ways from energetic "burning" or "controlled explosion" (in that it is limited to a smaller scale then say destruction of a galaxy from energy output, though that is very well what the first seconds of creation must have felt like).  The "afterbirth" or secondary effect of planets stems from a field of matter that collected and didn't burn hot enough to warrant a self explosion/black hole effect dimensional exchange point, so then planets only become what the relationship to chemicals, outside influences (magnetic, solar, orgone, etc.) determine
it to be in response to these and yet they also act similar to stars in the sense of slow burning or explosion at core.  The core acts like a localized, scaled down, and vastly slower burning star which, at its core, is the other end of a much smaller black hole dimensional
exchange point.  In this regard, it is highly possible that the exchange point does not come from a black hole (research into varying degrees of black holes and other correlary universal phenomenon necesarry on the scale of planet) but from another source which is correlary but much smaller by comparison; energetically

.....Or maybe not